Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Ian Patrick
ParticipantHi Alex, Thank you. That worked very well. Brilliant as always.
Kind regards
IanIan Patrick
ParticipantHi Alex,
Sorry to have bothered you. For anyone else I wrote this function:
function getChartCustomData() {
var deferred = jQuery.Deferred();
jQuery.get(‘https://ourServer/data/getdata.php?ACTION=Test’,data = {}).done(function(data){
deferred.resolve(data);
});
return deferred.promise();All works great now
CheersIan Patrick
ParticipantThank you Alexander for getting back to me. I’ve tried the Compatibility settings with not luck. all users are experiencing the same issue so it does look like something that has been deployed recently. Graphs work fine for all users in Chrome, Edge or Firefox.
Kind regards
IanIan Patrick
ParticipantHi, This works great.
Thank you.
IanIan Patrick
ParticipantP.S It does work in Chrome but I don’t always have access to that.
Thanks
Ian Patrick
ParticipantHi Alexander,
I’ve resolved the issue. My fault I was using the Field Name in the colorByLabel option instead of the Label Name!!
Kind regards
IanIan Patrick
ParticipantHi Alexander,
I’m getting random colors using colorByLabel. I’m using version 6.1.5.5 but still no luck. See attachment for option format. Is there a fix?
kind regards
Ian
Attachments:
Ian Patrick
ParticipantHi Alexander,
This solution works fine. Thanks for the solution.
Kind regards
IanIan Patrick
ParticipantHi Alexander,
Not sure if this is a similar issue. I’m using a field name in a Heading and it only updates the Heading value when the item is saved. Would there be a similar fix for this issue.
Many thanksIan
Ian Patrick
ParticipantAlexander, I’ve read other items in the forum now that suggest this approach won’t work. I’ve used an alternative solution that seems to work Ok for me. I prefill the text fields using SPServices then open the list item this prepopulates the Cascade field as I want and all seems to work fine.
Thanks
Ian
Ian Patrick
ParticipantHi Alexander,
This is a clear case of not being able to the wood for the trees!
The function that was in error was called from a rule that had previously been disabled. When I used the ‘bypass’ for some debugging then removed the bypass id it enabled all rules thus cause the error I hadn’t expected.Many thanks for your help alexander.
Kind regards
Ian
Ian Patrick
ParticipantHi Alexander,
Yes, this is the bypassed on the Misc tab.
It defaults to the Overlay (something I forgot to mention). I get this error on opening the form or reloading it (see error1 attached).I’ve attached the Edit Form Blob.
Thanks
IanAttachments:
October 13, 2015 at 11:30 in reply to: "Missing ID parameter for the list item in the URL" after upload on doc library #8712Ian Patrick
ParticipantHi Alexander, thank you for the rapid response. The issue appears to have resolved itself. I recreated the NewForm itself from another list and edited the ListIDs put the CEWPs back in and it started working. I guess there was some problem with the NewForm I had that I couldn’t see any issue with the CEWPs and used the same ones as on the previous NewForm. Thank you very much for your response…. By the way I love the new functionality in this version. I’ll send you another beer.. or 2
Kind regardsIan
October 13, 2015 at 10:40 in reply to: "Missing ID parameter for the list item in the URL" after upload on doc library #8708Ian Patrick
ParticipantHi Alexander,
I’ve started to get the DFFS ‘Missing ID’ error as above on the New Form in my list since loading a new DFFS version published Oct 06 2015 04:01:58pm (Frontend V4.357, CSS 4.10, JQuery 1.11.3, SPJS-Utilities 1.252). It is for a list not a library as above. The Edit form works fine on this list. I’ve tried deleting the configuration for the Newform and I’ve cleared out the browser cache as suggested above. Also, this version works fine on other Newforms on other lists. Any help greatly appreciated.
Kind regardsIan
Ian Patrick
ParticipantThanks Alexander for taking a look at this. I’ve attached a screen shot of the tab setup. Some further information; After some experimenting I think it’s not to do with the fact it was a read only field but that it is a People field that I’ve attached the header to. IS a header on a people field permitted?
Attachments:
-
AuthorPosts