AdamP

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 80 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Associate email field with Current Item URL #22788
    AdamP
    Participant

      Hi Mike

      Have you tried creating the HTML string in the body of the message?

      The tooltip on the body field says;

      Subject and Body
      This value can be a plain text or HTML. See help tab for instructions on how to use MUI.

      You can use the current value from a field in the message by using the FieldInternalName in curly braces like this:
      {NameOfField}
      ItemLink
      Use this in the Body to insert a link to the current items DispForm or EditForm:
      {viewitemlink}
      {edititemlink}
      You can wrap it in an anchor tag like this:

      <a href="{viewitemlink}">Link to item</a>

      So try;

      <a href="{viewitemlink}">{Title}</a>

      Adam

      • This reply was modified 6 years, 1 month ago by AdamP.
      AdamP
      Participant

        Thanks Alexander, great support as always

        in reply to: Formatting list names #22505
        AdamP
        Participant

          Have you explored the Field CSS tab in config?
          https://spjsblog.com/dffs/dffs-user-manual/#Field_CSS

          in reply to: Spinning and Loading with latest version 2.2.122 #22048
          AdamP
          Participant

            Thanks Alexander, and well done on tracking it down.
            The tab workaround works…it’s enough to just select “configure tabs” and save, no other tab setup needed.

            Adam

            in reply to: Spinning and Loading with latest version 2.2.122 #22027
            AdamP
            Participant

              Hi Alexander

              The single file substitution works – 2.2.105 into the latest package results in a functional vLookup.
              Substituting 2.2.108 also works.
              It seems to be the move to 2.2.116 in the 2018-01-21 package that causes it to fail for me.

              Adam

              in reply to: Spinning and Loading with latest version 2.2.122 #22007
              AdamP
              Participant

                Hi Charlene.

                I think this sounds like the same issue I’m currently encountering.
                Have a look at this thread
                Adam

                • This reply was modified 6 years, 3 months ago by AdamP. Reason: Corrected link
                in reply to: Require vLookup Values on New form #21859
                AdamP
                Participant

                  I’ve only used this snippet a couple of times, but I don’t think you need to call it in a rule on save, dffs_PreSaveAction() knows to run when the form is saved. Just add it to custom JS.

                  Adam

                  in reply to: v_Lookup "Prefill values in child" issue #21732
                  AdamP
                  Participant

                    If you save the child form does it retain the prefilled value in the year field?
                    Your config has the tick box for hide field ticked…my understanding is that hides the field on the child form, so the value is prefilled, and can’t be changed by end users.
                    If you untick it what happens?

                    AdamP
                    Participant

                      Latest Package (non-working);

                      spjs.vLookup.version;
                      “2.2.123”
                      spjs.vLookup.init();
                      undefined

                      Latest package modified with December 2017 SPJS-vLookup_frontend.js (working);

                      spjs.vLookup.version;
                      “2.2.108”
                      spjs.vLookup.init();
                      undefined

                      In both cases nothing seems to change after the init. The Latest version continues to show the /_layouts/images/gears_anv4.gif spinner and “Loading…” text.

                      AdamP
                      Participant

                        It seems I created a red herring in my initial assessment of this issue, I think there were some browser cache settings interfering.
                        The issue for us actually seems to lie in SPJS-vLookup_frontend.js.

                        I can install the very latest package of DFFS in it’s entirety and vlookup fails as per the original screenshot. If I then replace /SPJS/DFFS/plugins/SPJS-vLookup_frontend.js with the version from the 2017-12-20 package, vlookup fields immediately start to work correctly again.

                        Running firefox developer tools > network tab on an identical form, I get the following results consistently;
                        2017-12-20 vLookup_frontend: 73 requests, 4,045.71kB, 8.01s
                        2018-01-21 vLookup_frontend: 67 requests, 4,029.43kB, 7.52s

                        The 6 requests difference are the ones shown in the screenshot attached (using vlookup_frontend 2017-12-20), but with the later vlookup_frontend, they just don’t appear to fire at all.
                        Clicking the vLookup refresh button using vLookup_frontend 2017-12-20 returns the last 4 rows from the screenshot.

                        Is anyone else successfully running SharePoint 2010 and a vlookup version after 20th December 2017?

                        Thanks

                        Adam

                        AdamP
                        Participant

                          Double check your field names – they should be the internal names, not the display names (see the fields tab in DFFS config and copy/paste for best results).
                          In SP2010 the internal names for start time and end time in calendars aren’t entirely logical;
                          EventDate for start time, so use {EventDate}
                          EndDate for end time, so use {EndDate}

                          I don’t know if that holds true for later versions of SharePoint, but it’s a good place to start looking.

                          Adam

                          in reply to: DFFS Custom version – which one is in use? #21609
                          AdamP
                          Participant

                            All seems to be working correctly (incl in IE8 mode) in the latest version.
                            Thanks Alexander!

                            in reply to: DFFS Custom version – which one is in use? #21581
                            AdamP
                            Participant

                              I think I’ve spotted another slight bug with this, even in firefox.
                              If you select a list with a custom DFFS version installed, the installer reports the correct folder in the custom version field.
                              If you then switch to a different list using the “Target list:” dropdown, if there is no custom version installed then custom version field incorrectly reports the folder (it shows the value from the previously selected list with custom version installed)
                              The custom version field seems to only update correctly if a custom version is actually installed on the target list – which could lead to confusion.

                              AdamP
                              Participant

                                Yes – the whole package was updated – SPJS/DFFS folder replaced with entire package from the download. When we noticed the problem I started experimenting with the custom versions to track down the issue.

                                I can force it to fail by switching from DFFSv2017-12-20 to DFFSv2018-01-21. Then replacing DFFS_loader.html from 2017-12-20 into the 2018-01-21 version appears to restore the vlookup functionality, although ace.js doesn’t actually exist on the path specified in the older loader…

                                Firefox behaves exactly the same as IE11 (in IE8 mode), changing the document mode in IE has no effect.

                                in reply to: DFFS Custom version – which one is in use? #21542
                                AdamP
                                Participant

                                  Actually, if I let the debugger run, I end up with three of the same error in the console – presumably one for each form.

                                Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 80 total)