Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Ryan CornfootParticipant
Hi Alex,
This solution works best for me, the load times are minimal and even though I am still getting “500” errors, it works for over 5000 items.
Thanks Again.
Ryan CornfootParticipantI wasn’t sure Autocomplete could do it, but I have just seen your reply in the Autocomplete Forum.
Ill have a go with that and see how it goes.
Thanks for all your help Alex.
Ryan CornfootParticipantHi Alex,
It works, but the load time in IE8 is horrendous (Not your fault obviously)
Google Chrome – NewForm Load Time = 7 sec (Up by around 5 seconds)
Internet Explorer 8 – NewForm Load Time = 1 min 38 sec! (up by over a minute)Im going to try and go down the route of getting the threshold removed.
Ryan CornfootParticipantOK Alex, thanks for you time and efforts on this!
Ryan CornfootParticipantI have just tested the above theory, it does not work.
Making it one field doesnt help either 🙁
Ryan CornfootParticipantI can try the one field yes, however I’m thinking I might try it a different way…
User selects their Division, Business Unit and account, then enters their ID number this will pre filter the results to a maximum of 951 possible items. (Max people in any one account)
Does that sound like it could make a difference? The reason I think it will is because the initial load query will only return 5 unique values (Divisions) Or do CAML Queries not work this way?
Ryan CornfootParticipantIndexing doesnt help 🙁
Ryan CornfootParticipantThey are all basic data, name, divisions, accounts etc. Nothing Fancy, no metadata.
Ill try an index now.
P.S I have just checked the error in F12 Developer mode and it is saying the following: “The attempted operation is prohibited because it exceeds the list view threshold enforced by the administrator.”
Ryan CornfootParticipantAlex, Could this be related to the 5000 item threshold set by our SP Farm admin?
Ryan CornfootParticipantDont know if this helps, its just a screenshot of the config, there are more Field Internal names but you cant see them due to length.
Attachments:
Ryan CornfootParticipantIt says something about field types but it works fine <5000 items…
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><soap:Envelope xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"><soap:Body><soap:Fault><faultcode>soap:Server</faultcode><faultstring>Exception of type 'Microsoft.SharePoint.SoapServer.SoapServerException' was thrown.</faultstring><detail><errorstring xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/soap/">One or more field types are not installed properly. Go to the list settings page to delete these fields.</errorstring><errorcode xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/soap/">0x81020014</errorcode></detail></soap:Fault></soap:Body></soap:Envelope>
Ryan CornfootParticipant*Request Headers*
Accept:application/xml, text/xml, */*; q=0.01 Accept-Encoding:gzip, deflate Accept-Language:en-GB,en-US;q=0.8,en;q=0.6 Connection:keep-alive Content-Length:1080 Content-Type:text/xml; charset=UTF-8 Cookie:_ga=GA1.2.140540675.1424861500; Ribbon.ListForm.Edit=632492|-1|328|-800423560; WSS_KeepSessionAuthenticated={9e742d76-c8cb-4594-a749-f80bafb31eca} Host:ameyportal.ameygroup.int Origin:http://MYSERVER Referer:http://MYSERVER/sites/travel/Lists/Travel%20Requests/NewForm.aspx?RootFolder=&IsDlg=1 User-Agent:Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/45.0.2454.101 Safari/537.36 X-Requested-With:XMLHttpRequest
*Response Headers*
Cache-Control:private Content-Length:711 Content-Type:text/xml; charset=utf-8 Date:Fri, 09 Oct 2015 13:11:46 GMT MicrosoftSharePointTeamServices:14.0.0.6115 Server:Microsoft-IIS/7.5 X-AspNet-Version:2.0.50727 X-MS-InvokeApp:1; RequireReadOnly X-Powered-By:ASP.NET
*SPJS Version*
1.252- This reply was modified 8 years, 6 months ago by Ryan Cornfoot.
- This reply was modified 8 years, 6 months ago by Ryan Cornfoot.
- This reply was modified 8 years, 6 months ago by Ryan Cornfoot.
Ryan CornfootParticipantI also get this error when Querying a list of 20K items, if I reduce its size it works fine.
Ryan CornfootParticipantOr I may just use a lookup/cascading dropdown solution…
Ryan CornfootParticipantBehaves perfectly using a lookup field, ill look into your autocomplete solution 🙂
Thanks for looking into this.
-
AuthorPosts