Strange bug found in 1.0.17.0 with vLookup

Home Forums Modern DFFS Strange bug found in 1.0.17.0 with vLookup

Viewing 4 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #36669
      Marcus Khoo
      Participant

        Hi,
        I found a strage bug.
        I have a form with 5 lookup fields on it.
        1. Lookup with values from list 1
        2. Lookup with values from list 2
        3. Lookup with values from list 3 but filtered by the “parent” value as selected in Lookup 2
        4. Lookup with values from list 2
        5. Lookup with values from List 3 but filtered by the “parent” value as selected in Lookup 4

        (List 3 contains a lookup to list 2 which is the “parent”)

        I also have a vLookup on this form and I have enabled the “New” button to create a new version of the same list item. I want to transfer Lookups 1, 2 and 4 into the new list item.
        This WORKS perfectly but here is the bug:

        In the new item Lookups 1, 2 and 4 are all populated correctly. However, for this new item the options in Lookup 3 are NOT correctly filtered. The options shown are repeating sets of the options I want.

        Stangely when I use Lookup 5 the options ARE filtered correctly by the selection in Lookup 4

        Summary: The behaviour is correct for the new Lookup 5 but incorrect for the new Lookup 3

        Hope that all makes sense to you Alexander.
        Best regards and congratulations on such an great product.

      • #36672
        Alexander Bautz
        Keymaster

          I’ll have to try to recreate this in a test site to try to figure it out. Can you send me some screenshots of each of the lists so I can see the structure of the data and also the configuration of each of the lookup columns.

          Include also the error / repeating sets of options in the number 3 lookup.

          Alexander

        • #36677
          Marcus Khoo
          Participant

            I’ll have to make you a small movie and send it over as it is quite complicated and difficult to explain in text.

          • #36679
            Marcus Khoo
            Participant

              Strangely I can’t repeat it now! Shelve it for the time being and I’ll report if I see it again.
              Thanks Alexander

            • #36684
              Alexander Bautz
              Keymaster

                OK, thanks for the update.

                Alexander

            Viewing 4 reply threads
            • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.