[Leonid]

Here is the part Im not getting. The sample suggests autopopulating parentId in the Child list from parent’s list ID. But that ID doesnt exist in a New form, only in Edit and View forms. My approach is to pass ID from the Child list (after item is created there) to a field in the New form. That doesnt work.

[Leonid]

Looks like I already know the answer to previous question – its yes. Right now Im puzzled to pass ID of a newly created item in a child list to a field in the parent list in a New form

[Leonid]

Thx Alex! Would it allow use rules for the fields in the chcild list?

[Leonid]

Thanks Alex,
In fact, display name has a comma “Daw, A. John”, whereas UserInfo shows name as “John Daw”. I’ll keep digging

[Leonid]

oh my, thanks Alex!

[Leonid]

Yes, I need a method/property to use in Custom JS javascript. Preferably it will be array, list or collection of fileds that I can filter by InternalName

• This reply was modified 5 years ago by Leonid.

[Leonid]

Alex,

The NEW form has a lookup field with multiple values. I need to read its value BEFORE form is submitted. Please suggest approach. So far all the spjs.dffs objects I looked have empty value:
getFieldValue()
afterProperties
beforeProperties

[Leonid]

Alex, other fields show defined values when checked in dffs_PreSaveAction. Only multi- lookup is empty. Single- lookup field shows correct value as well. Feels like a bug.
I hope theres a way to make a Rule work with multi- lookup field. If not, I need to check multi- lookup values before submitting the form and populate a hidden field based on selection.

[Leonid]

Its a New form. Other properties correctly show the fields values.
By “Custom javascript function” you suggect jQuery instead of getFieldValue?

[Leonid]

Alex,
This is SP Online. I checked spjs.dffs.beforeProperties in dffs_PreSaveAction and value is empty. What am I missing?

Attachments:

1. 

   m1.png
   

2. 

   m2.png
   

[Leonid]

adding to above: the SPFieldLookupMulti field is not exposed in
`spjs.dffs.beforeProperties

[Leonid]

Its working now from the Rule. Thanks!

Attachments:

1. 

   meta4.png
   

[Leonid]

Thanks Alex!
Please verify if behavior in the snapshot when the Rule w/o checkbox tries to populate a META data field.
The value doesnt resolve automatically to the Term.

Attachments:

1. 

   meta3.png
   

[Leonid]

Please see snapshots. I tried setting Data Confidentiality field in the Rule to
Private
Private;

None worked. Anything Im missing?

Attachments:

1. 

   meta2.png
   

2. 

   meta1.png
   

[Leonid]

Thanks Alex!
Any plans to make setting value available for META data field in the Rule? Sofar it doesnt work

[Author]

Posts