Rule with Managed META Data column

[Leonid]

Wondering how to make the RULE work with “contains”. Sofar its failing to recognize the match

Attachments:

1. 

   data.png
   

[Alexander Bautz]

Hi,
This appear to be a bug and I’ll get it fixed in a new version in a day or two.

Sorry for the inconvenience,
Alexander

[Leonid]

Thanks Alex!
Any plans to make setting value available for META data field in the Rule? Sofar it doesnt work

[Alexander Bautz]

I’m not sure what you mean – I can use a ManagedMetadata field in the Set field value in the bottom of a rule – can you give me some more details?

Alexander

[Leonid]

Please see snapshots. I tried setting Data Confidentiality field in the Rule to
Private
Private;

None worked. Anything Im missing?

Attachments:

1. 

   meta2.png
   

2. 

   meta1.png
   

[Alexander Bautz]

Ah, you are right – when using the “Only if the field is empty” checkbox the value is not properly validated as empty and the field will not be set. I’ll get this fixed in the next release.

Until then, you can put this in your Custom JS:

function setDataConfidentialityToPrivate(){
    if(String(getFieldValue("YOUR_FIELD_NAME")).length === 0){
        setFieldValue("YOUR_FIELD_NAME", "YOUR_VALUE");
    }
}

And put the function name setDataConfidentialityToPrivate in the Run these functions / trigger these rules field in your rule.

Replace YOUR_FIELD_NAME and YOUR_VALUE with the correct values.

Alexander

[Leonid]

Thanks Alex!
Please verify if behavior in the snapshot when the Rule w/o checkbox tries to populate a META data field.
The value doesnt resolve automatically to the Term.

Attachments:

1. 

   meta3.png
   

[Alexander Bautz]

It looks like you have white-space before and after the string – can you post your code?

Alexander

[Leonid]

Its working now from the Rule. Thanks!

Attachments:

1. 

   meta4.png
   

[Author]

Posts