Bug found in 1.0.71.0

Home Forums Modern DFFS Bug found in 1.0.71.0

Viewing 2 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #38194
      Marcus Khoo
      Participant

        When using the new field switcher function (field control can be switched to another field). The pop up that shows the fields is too narrow and fieldnames are wrapped as seen in the attachment.

        ALSO

        Feature request.
        When configuring a vLookup would it be possible to enter “Number of items to fetch” to 0
        Which will disable the HTTP request entirely and remove the table display?
        Why? Well, it will allow the vLookup button to just be used as a “Add new item” and is very useful as a “Clone this item” function.

        Thanks!

        Attachments:
      • #38196
        Alexander Bautz
        Keymaster

          Hi,
          I’ll fix the change field issue in the next version

          The other issue can be achieved by setting the number of items to fetch to 0 and then use custom css to hide the “No items match the query” message.

          Get the ID to the vLookup in the vLookup configuration (bottom of first tab) and change it like this (adding “empty_”) and add it to custom css:

          #vLookup_empty_7419064349689197{
            display:none;
          }
          
        • #38200
          Marcus Khoo
          Participant

            I tried this workaround but I found that the button and the message have the same DIV id

            So I am currently hiding the message using the class name in custom css:

            .vLookup_empty_72a09689{
            display:none;
            }

            Attachments:
            • #38204
              Alexander Bautz
              Keymaster

                That will unfortunately not work because the suffix after the class is generated new on every page load. If you want to keep the reload button and only want to hide the label you can change it like this:

                #vLookup_empty_7419064349689197 > div > div {
                  display:none;
                }
                

                I’ll add a separate ID to the label in the next version so you can address it by ID directly.

                Alexander

          Viewing 2 reply threads
          • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.