William Summers

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 38 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • William Summers
    Participant

    good day!

    I used spjs.utility.userProfile(); to access the properties on the UPS. Unfortunately, most of the columns do not work. An example is I have to use {currentUser:EMail} instead of what the ups says is WorkEmail. I tried AccountName on both a text field and a people field. I am attaching a picture of my fields along with a snapshot of my console output. Any guidance would be appreciated.

    Thanks!

    cant delete this… found I was using currentuser instead of userprofile. nevermind this entire comment.

    Attachments:
    in reply to: Email and Print #13701
    William Summers
    Participant

    Any ideas on the above per chance?

    in reply to: Email and Print #13577
    William Summers
    Participant

    QQ. I have a people field that is set to display workEMail. In the list view as well as the dispform it shows the email address. However, in the editform it shows the resolved username. The email functionality requires it to be an email in the people field.
    I want to email from the editform using a people field. Currently, I have a rule that sets the value of that people field. {setCurrentUser:Email} no matter what I have tried, in the editform the people field resolves the name to lastname, firstname

    Thanks

    in reply to: New version sept 20 #13342
    William Summers
    Participant

    it will. I am requesting that it be removed. It affects almost 20k sites and is crazy… before my time it was placed but no reason any more.

    in reply to: New version sept 20 #13338
    William Summers
    Participant

    update: last one….
    All of my issues can be traced back to the masterpage loading an old version of jquery. That being said, maybe this will help others.

    debugging lead me to this. masterpage loads old version of jquery my company uses. I used a CEWP and in the source placed <script src=”/sites/yoursite/spjs/dffs/plugins/jquery.js”></script> to point it at the correct one. Wow what a long thread for something that is our own fault….

    in reply to: New version sept 20 #13333
    William Summers
    Participant

    update: sorry about all the posts but maybe someone is following along…
    I deleted the config for the edit form again. When entering dffs on the edit form, instead of copying from the new form this time I just created a new config and it seems to have solved the issue. That being said, seems like maybe the new version does not like either the rules or tabs of js or css or html or something. It is highly customized form for anyone wondering.

    in reply to: New version sept 20 #13331
    William Summers
    Participant

    update to above… I deleted the config for it. reinstalled dffs on the list. Opened the edit form and copied the config from the new form. same error. will try to create a brand new one.

    in reply to: New version sept 20 #13329
    William Summers
    Participant

    ok still working through a few things. In a list leveraging jslink. I ran the setup, uninstalled the jslink, installed using the installer. The new form works great and as expected. The edit form gives me the error dffs loader failed to load. /sites…/…dffs/js/dffs_backend_min.js. attaching picture.

    I tried to delete the record in the config list (spjs configuration) for the edit form, re-import the config and same error.

    On display form, it sits at the overlay and never recovers. I will continue to troublshoot.

    in reply to: New version sept 20 #13322
    William Summers
    Participant

    OK last update I think. I completely deleted the spjs library and its contents. Something in there seems to have been the issue. I then recreated the library, uploaded the dffs folder to it, recreated a new list and installed dffs on it and it is now working. Great work sir as always!

    in reply to: New version sept 20 #13317
    William Summers
    Participant

    OK so I am updating my last post. For some reason it is not working. I deleted the old dffs folder and uploaded the new 21st one after making sure the vars are correct. The install on a new list goes fine. When I go to the form, the overlay loads fine but then I get the error that dffs is not installed correctly.

    I make a new site and a new list. Do the same thing and everything works fine. I am assuming there is something left over causing the original to not work. I am going to dig a little further.

    in reply to: New version sept 20 #13283
    William Summers
    Participant

    ok great info! I think I mis spoke here. the main question I have is this.
    I create a spjs library on the root site. upload the DFFS folder and everything works great.
    I go to a subsite and want to install dffs. Do I need to add the spjs library and dffs to the subsite or is there a way to create just a page in the subsite and point it to the root installer file? Hope this makes more sense but so far, awesome as always!

    in reply to: Upgrade to July10 field order numbers not displaying #12798
    William Summers
    Participant

    ok I know I am not giving you what you want but that is because I am trying to get our team to abandon the old version first. I have no problem going back as this seems to have solved the issue. I was using the JSlink but now am back to CEWP. When I enter the setup, I get this version info.
    Dynamic Forms for SharePoint DFFS Backend v4.352|4.10|spjs-utility version: 1.25

    I am still going to do some testing and get you what you are looking for however, Just need time. Again, I appreciate all your help!

    in reply to: Upgrade to July10 field order numbers not displaying #12789
    William Summers
    Participant

    Also, I am now using the JSLink method instead of the CEWP method which may be the issue. Not sure.

    in reply to: Upgrade to July10 field order numbers not displaying #12787
    William Summers
    Participant

    I may have found an issue. My masterpage loads 1.7.1 jquery. This has not caused an issue in the past as i used a CEWP to point to the correct version you would bundle in earlier versions. What version can I go back to that might be compatible with 1.7.1? If not know i will go through a few older versions until i find one that works. Thanks!

    in reply to: Email and Print #12293
    William Summers
    Participant

    ok so I put someone elses name in the “To” field and it also returns invalid. It looks to be working only if I use “currentUserEmail”. To be clear, this method still only works for everyone BUT me. The plot thickens.

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 38 total)