Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Alexander, the only thing I can see that seems relevant is the row level security. If I login as a user with full permissions, the list displays correctly. If I have limited permissions, it shows the records I have access to in the list briefly, but then the list disappears. If you want to see it, I can send you a login and you can see the behavior.
Thanks,
JohnAlexander, no errors on the page. The page is an add new form for a calendar object, pretty straight forward form.
I do have row level security on the underlying Sharepoint Calendar list. It also seems that if the user has full access to the lookup object, the list works as expected. If the user has partial access, only access to specific rows, the list will show and then immediately disappear. The list does seem to show the right records (ones the user has access too), but it just disappears almost immediately and you get the little red box beside the field like you had entered an invalid entry.
In the end, I decided to put an AutoComplete field on the form (required that field) and used the autocomplete to set the value of the hidden lookup field.
Seems to be working fine with no performance issue.
Thanks for the help!
John
Alexander,
When I add this I get:
DFFS: There is an error in the Customer JS textarea:
Error: Could not complete the operation due to error 80020101Chrome gives : SyntaxError: Unexpected token ILLEGAL
Not sure what I’m doing wrong here.
just converted to the non CEWP method, and I’m also seeing the unformatted FOUC. I’ve added DFFS_frontend_overlay.html to a CEWP at the top of the page.
The overlay shows (DFFS is Loading..) but never closes. You have to click on it. What am I missing here or doing wrong?
Thanks,
JohnSorry Alexander, just got back to this one. It’s a numeric field. I’ve tried the same thing on a text field on the form with the same result. It just doesn’t call the function. I know the rule is being hit because if I put the message in the “Alert this Message” part of the rule, it works as expected.
John
Alexander, as always, that works great. Now, I was already using a special configuration to format the date as so {“dateFormat”:”MM/dd/yy HH:mm”}. How do I combine the two or just return the date with this format?
Thanks again!
John
