Home › Forums › Modern DFFS › Text box amendments text missing
- This topic has 11 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 5 months, 3 weeks ago by
Paul Keane.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
July 25, 2025 at 10:19 #38763
There is an issue with the DFFS forms (View and Edit) when I create a text box that I want to have amended, It appears on the form as a list of name and date/time stamps but there is no visible text.
When I disable DFFS I get the Name and date/time stamp and the text.
-
July 26, 2025 at 08:28 #38768
Hi,
I tested with both a multiline plain text and rich text both in dispform and editform, but the values show as they are supposed to – see attached image.Can you check the developer tools (F12 > Console) and see if there are any errors that might give a clue?
Alexander
Attachments:
-
July 26, 2025 at 08:32 #38770
I forgot to ask which version of Modern DFFS you are running in this site.
Alexander
-
July 30, 2025 at 09:42 #38784
V 1.1.4.0
-
July 30, 2025 at 10:49 #38785
Here is a screen shot of the console
Attachments:
-
July 30, 2025 at 15:26 #38787
The console.log did not provide any clues unfortunately. I’m not aware that I have fixed any related issues in later versions, but try updating to the latest version (currently v1.2.6.0) and see if that fixes the issue.
Alexander
-
July 30, 2025 at 15:50 #38788
I have requested update thank you … Ill keep you posted
-
July 30, 2025 at 16:12 #38789
Hi Alex – I found that the naming convention is key again with this issue keeping it plain seemed to fix the error (Even though no error message). Then I re-named it to suit my needs Cheers
-
July 30, 2025 at 21:45 #38797
I’m glad you were able to fix it. Do you know what the original field name was? – I can try to recreate it and see if I can prevent this error in the future.
Alexander
-
-
July 31, 2025 at 08:31 #38799
it was 1.13 Feedback
-
July 31, 2025 at 18:30 #38800
Thanks, I have made changes to ensure this works in the next version. The problem was all the underscore characters in the field internal name. Using 1.13 Feedback as the field name results in this internal name: _x0031__x002e_13_x0020_Feedback.
The problem then escalates when the version history of the list item for some reason uses this as the internal name for the same field (all “_” characters are converted to “_x005f_”): OData__x005f_x0031_x005f__x005f_x002e_x005f_13_x005f_x0020_x005f_Feedback
Alexander
-
August 1, 2025 at 10:04 #38801
Thanks for all your help
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.



