Error in the Custom JS

Forums SPJS-Lookup Error in the Custom JS

Viewing 2 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #6904
      Jeff Law
      Participant

      HI,

      I am trying to test out the new version of SPJS-Lookup, but I keep running into a problem where I get the “DFFS: There is an error in the Custom JS”.

      I haven’t been able to track down what the problem is, and I must confess to not being a js expert, so most of my troubleshooting is by comparison and trial and error ๐Ÿ™‚

      My latest incarnation is as follows:

      
      
      spjs.lookup.init({
      	fieldToConvertToDropdown:"jslCompanies",	
      	listName:"Companies",
      	listBaseUrl:"/",
      	optTextFieldInternalName:"Title",
      	sortFieldName:"Title",
      	filterObj:{
      		on:false,
      		CAML:null, 
      		fin:"Completed",
      		isLookup:false,
      		operator:"Neq",
      		filterVal:"1"
      	},
      	dropDownDefaultvalue:"...",
      	addYouOwnValue:{
      		on:false,
      		linkText:"Write your own value"
      	},
      	addToExternalList:{
      		on:false,
      		customFunction:null, 
      		linkText:"Add new item",
      		saveNewItemText:"Save new item"
      	},
      	debug:false
      });

      I have tried with the parameter names enclosed in quotes as per web site article as well. eg

      "fieldToConvertToDropdown":"jslCompanies",

      Is there some basic js thing that I have missed?

      Also, I was wondering if the filterObj, addYourOwnValue, and addToexternalList were optional parameters and could be left out if you didn’t want to use the functionality.

      Regards
      Jeff

    • #6907
      Jeff Law
      Participant

      Ok, found the problem… Actually a combination of 2 things, but the primary one was.. and this is even more embarrassing as this didn’t get copied across correctly above…

      I seem to have added a $ in front of spjs.lookup.init({.. eg $spjs.lookup.init({…

      It does have to be without the $ sign ๐Ÿ™‚

      By removing that $, and making sure the CEWP was below the form, I now get a result!!

    • #6926
      Alexander Bautz
      Keymaster

      I’m glad you figured it out.

      Alexander

Viewing 2 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.